Posts Tagged ‘thinking big’

Everybody Does It (Do You?)

Tuesday, November 8th, 2011

Your perspective, the way you see the world, can influence your language, the way you use words. But your language can also influence your perspective.

If you’d like to think bigger about who you are and what you offer the world, then just a small change in your choice of words may open up whole new worlds.

A number of years ago, while speaking with my teacher, I made a statement declaring, “Everybody’s like that.” My teacher replied, “Are they?” “Well…I guess…no, not really,” I stammered. He asked me if I would be open to observing my language for the use of generalities and declarative statements that were not empirically based. I agreed and was surprised by what I found.

You too, may be surprised by how often you use declarative statements that don’t allow room for alternatives or other possibilities.

Notice my choice of words in this post thus far. The above sentence leaves room for an alternative by suggesting that, “You might be surprised” rather than “You will be surprised.” Earlier I said that a “small change in your choice of words, may open up whole new worlds,” and that “the way you see the world can influence your language” and that “your language can also influence your perspective.”

You’ll often find declarative and general statements in the language of marketers, especially aggressive marketers. “This is the only thing you’ll ever need to learn and the only thing you’ll ever need to know and the only thing you’ll ever need to do…”

From the marketer’s perspective, that kind of language is often designed to close you off to the possibility that it might not be the right product for you and that it might, in fact, not help you. Sure, you’ll often see “may” and “should” used to reduce the marketer’s liability but, for the most part, marketers try to close off your thinking so that you focus only on what they are suggesting you buy into.

I imagine that you don’t care much for that kind of language when it’s directed at you. Although, you might love it, I don’t know. But, putting that aside for the moment, think about how your mind might react if all of the language you used included declarative statements.

If you emphatically declare, “All men are like that,” or “I can never trust again,” how are you going to create space in your mind, your perspective, for a man that does meet your expectations?

If you generalize that, “All rich people are snobs,” how are you going to see yourself as a wealthy person so that you can improve your professional and financial status?

If you state that “All liberals are socialists,” or that “All Tea Party members are crazies,” how do you come together to make things better?

Often these viewpoints are a reflection of something that scares us but even the simple, little things can make a difference. When you say something like, “You didn’t take out the trash,” the other person is immediately accused of doing something wrong. However, if you say, “It seems like you didn’t take out the trash. Am I correct?” you leave room for an alternative.

So does the way you see the world influence your choice of words or does your choice of words influence the way you see the world? I believe it’s both.

Often, it’s suggested that you simply change your actions to get better results. However, if your worldview doesn’t change to support the new actions, you may find it difficult to sustain the new actions. Moreover, it can be difficult to simply say, “Ok, as of today I’m going to see the world in a different way,” if your language doesn’t support the change.

If you’d like to quite smoking but every time you attempt the feat, you find yourself repeating, “I can’t get through the day without a cigarette,” how do you think it influences the way you see the world and the outcome of your effort? By making a slight change in your language to something like, “It’s been hard to get through the day without a cigarette,” leaves room for the possibility that it is doable.

If you’d like to lose weight but you consistently say things like, “Oh, I could never do without my chocolate fix,” how do you think it influences the way you see the world and your waistline? Instead, trying saying, “I am used to having a chocolate fix.” That slight change alone might open up the possibility that you can live without it.

If you want to build a business and hear yourself saying things like, “Marketing takes too much time,” or “Getting clients is just hard,” or “Every time I get a lead, ‘this’ happens,” how do you think it influences the way you see the world and influences the actions you take?

Using different language like, “I’ve found that when I get a lead this has been happening,” allows you to explore alternatives. Instead of generalizing that “marketing takes too much time,” saying, “I’ve found that marketing has taken me a lot of time,” might leave room for exploration. And, well, saying, “Getting clients is just hard,” doesn’t seem like it will help the situation, now does it?

I would venture a guess that you have made a declarative statement or two over the years. I know I have. I now do my best not to. But when I do, I try to catch myself and amend my statement.

Whether it’s on little things or big things, all generalities are false (including that one).

And just think about how your choice of words makes the world see you.

Reject Doom, Gloom and a Double Dip Recession

Friday, August 5th, 2011

Yesterday was a bad day for the world markets. Economic growth is flat. World governments, with the U.S. leading the way, are dysfunctional.  And starting today, you’re going to hear the phrase, “double dip recession” ad nauseam

Don’t let it program you into a small thinking, fear-driven choices.

You can buy into groupthink and de-individualism or you can be in an individual who charts your own course. Which will it be?

Any progression, global, local, or personal, is about being fully self-expressed in the face of all the forces that conspire to pacify your drive, your hunger to be the most you can be. It starts inside you. And that’s how it should be.

This is your time—to think bigger about yourself and what you are capable of. Because, if not now, when?

Yet it is inevitable that your transformation will set an example for others.

As people experience personal revolutions, they will join with others to bring about bigger, more sweeping changes.

Hopefully, and ideally, this is a revolution that will bring us together to achieve something even bigger—the changes we need to make a better world.

In the meantime, you will achieve more than you imagined possible when you reject doom and gloom groupthink and de-individualism and choose to think bigger about who you are and what you offer the world.

Your Dreams Matter to the World

Wednesday, June 29th, 2011

“What are my dreams to the world? Does it really matter if I keep thinking small?” It matters.

Thinking small is no longer an alternative. Fatalistic thinking has never worked. It’s killing us—our society, our environment, our dreams. I think we need to deal with it.

We live in the world. We need to understand it. More—our world needs us. Sometimes thinking big means facing up to some harsh realities, like the cost of thinking small. Let’s start with a few reminders. It might not be pretty.

Throughout history, small thoughts have stood in opposition to big thoughts.

  • The church reviled Galileo. The earth is flat, right?
  • Darwin was disbelieved in his time. We couldn’t possibly be descended from apes, could we?
  • Slave owners fought to the death to prevent abolition (don’t get me started on sex trafficking).
  • Men did not let women vote (still the case in many parts of the world).
  • Jazz was deemed illicit.
  • Someone tried to kill the electric car (many are still trying).
  • Books (and sometimes even the publishers’ offices) continue to be burned. Writers are incarcerated.
  • We are poisoning our environment, but we keep on guzzling gas, consuming stuff, stuff, and more stuff and piling up trash.
  • Endless wars are waged because nobody wants to let go of their hatred and moral posturing long enough to enable peace.

We are up against a society controlled by people and institutions who generally think small.

  • The corporation that seeks to control and manipulate what you think, what you buy, what you believe.
  • The friend who tells you not to be too big for your britches.
  • The husband who dominates his wife and makes her feel irrelevant.
  • The teacher who tells you there is only one way to do something.
  • The television network who wants to dumb you down.
  • The news media who want to tell you lies and answer no questions.
  • The self-help guru who tells you to face death to really live (and people actually die).

Albert Einstein once said:

“Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices, but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence and fulfills the duty to express the results of his thought in clear form.”

Express yourself. Be bold. Take risks. Stand for something. Think big.

Your Personal Revolution

Tuesday, June 14th, 2011

Revolution is more than just a political necessity. It is also a personal necessity.

Revolution is about one person at a time experiencing their own personal empowerment against an existing, deficient (small thinking) system.

The deficient system may be something as big as a whole political system, or more local, like the system of a family, job, or relationship structure. It may just be the way you think about yourself and your capabilities.

Any revolution, global, local, or personal, is about being fully self-expressed in the face of all the forces that conspire to pacify your drive, your hunger to be the most you can be.

At first, others may not even know about your revolution. It starts inside you. And that’s how it should be. This is your revolution—to think bigger about yourself and what you are capable of.

Yet it is inevitable that your transformation will set an example for others. The rest is organic. As people experience personal revolutions, they will join with others to bring about bigger, more sweeping changes.

Although your revolution will start with you changing the way you think, yours in not just a revolution about individual thinking and personal success (though you will achieve more than you imagined possible when you start thinking big); yours is a revolution that will bring us together to achieve something even bigger—the changes we need to make a better world.

Undercover Boss is Bad for Business and The Secret Millionaire is Bad for Society

Wednesday, April 20th, 2011

My friend, Terry Starbucker, a leadership expert, wrote a compelling post entitled, The Trouble With Undercover Boss (If Your’e a Boss), where he makes the case that the CBS show is bad for bosses because a great CEO would be “known to EVERY employee; that is, there would be no way that the CEO could go on [the show]. He or she would be recognized immediately.” Indeed.

I also think Undercover Boss is bad for America’s, so called, “working class” and that ABC’s The Secret Millionaire is bad for society.

Shut the front door! Did he just say that The Secret Millionaire is bad for society? Isn’t that a bit over the top?

I did say it. And, yes, maybe it is a bit hyperbolic. But, to my mind, both shows exploit America’s working class for entertainment purposes. I think of it as Poorsploitation. Just like Blacksploitation films of the 70′s created an entire genre of film, Poorsploitation in the 2000′s has created an entire genre of TV programming.

Sure, some posit that the Blaxploitation trend was a token of black empowerment, but many civil rights leaders and activists, alike, felt the genre perpetuated common white stereotypes about black people and, as a result, many called for the end of the Blaxploitation genre. I’d like to call an end to these Poorsploitation programs because they too suggest some sort of empowerment and recognition for the working class but instead, insidiously perpetuate the stereotype of the working class as lost and helpless without the benevolent boss or the millionaire to make their life better and worthwhile.

Not only are Undercover Boss and Secret Millionaire “Poorsploitation” programs but I’d even include Extreme Home Makeover in the category. Much of the programming that is produced in the “reality TV” genre exploits individuals or groups for the entertainment of others. Think of The Biggest Loser (even the name is exploitative) and Intervention, which exploits people with the disease of addiction so we, the audience, can invade the most personal aspect of a someone’s life to marvel at the destruction these addicts have caused and the pathetic life they live.

Of course, you’ll argue that Intervention helps these addicts get into recovery and that is important and meaningful; that Undercover Boss helps the CEO have an awakening and that’s good for his employees; that The Secret Millionaire recognizes how fortunate they are and gives money to people doing important, charitable work; that the families in Extreme Home Makeover get treated to the most amazing new home and so much love from so many people. You might even argue, and you’d have a good point, that The Biggest Loser saves lives by helping morbidly obese people shed hundred of pounds. And, yes, participants choose to be on these shows, even vie for the opportunity to be on these shows.

We must consider, however, that exploitation is often insidious. It starts small and then creeps up on you day by day until its virus takes hold and sickens your entire system. In my book, the idea of a boss tricking their underlings, or a millionaire bamboozling poor people, into thinking they are someone other than who they say they are, is unethical.

Moreover, if a “millionaire” selling aspirational products to folks that can barely scrape two nickels together doesn’t know how “real” people live, she’s completely out of touch with reality and consumed by a blindly ego-centric point of view. How can she not know that the average working person in America earns about $50,000 over the course of one year and that the working poor might earn $17,000, not $500,000 in 5-minutes at the back of the room after a sales pitch from the stage.

Just as insidious is the idea that some big shot CEO comes down to the level of his peasants and realizes that he (usually seems to be a man) can’t do the job he asks his employees to do. Well, Praise Be! He has an epiphany and realizes that his decisions effect the people who work for him, that they’re human beings with aspirations and dreams, and that he should change a few things about the way he does business? Are you serious?

You run a multi-million dollar, often multi-hundred million dollar company and you need to go on a TV show where you trick your employees into thinking you’re someone else to have this realization? If I was on the board of one of these companies and was witness to this travesty, I’d fire the CEO before the first commercial break. Oh, and, to add insult to injury, the CEO gives the employee a tiny promotion with a tiny increase in salary or maybe $5000 to go to school to learn how to become a chef, as was the case on one episode. Again, are you kidding? What’s $5000 to a company with tens of millions or 100′s of millions of dollars in sales? And, let’s not forget the tens of millions of dollars in publicity and advertising these companies and individuals get for going on these shows.

These programs feed on the disease of small thinking and I, for one, stand against them. Call me a bleeding heart. Call me a tree hugger. Call me too sensitive. Call me self-righteous. Call me whatever you want, I just think we should expect more from our “millionaires,” our “bosses,” and ourselves, by working for more transparency, more equality, more empathy, and more respect.

Let’s (always) think bigger about who we are and what we offer the world.

UPDATE: Andy just pointed me to a segment that Bill Maher did on his show about this very topic about these specific programs. (If you watch the segment, please do your best to not make this post about Bill Maher. The discussion in the comments is sophisticated and diverse in opinions and all commenters have done a great job focussing on the questions raised in the post.)

Oh, and the share buttons finally started working again so you can use them, if you like.

We Cannot Wait For Other People To Tell Us That We’re Worthwhile

Saturday, April 2nd, 2011

When we think small, we bury our true nature under fat layers of persona— professional, personal, web-related, and other temporary disguises.

We become a doctor because our mother or father was one, and though it is a worthy career, maybe it is not the one we would have chosen. Maybe I want to be a professional rock climber or a cellist. Maybe you want to be a sculptor or a translator. But no one supports us in this calling. Instead of following what our instinct, our spirit tells us, we follow what others tell us to do. By resisting ourselves, we create our own condition of scarcity.

What do you resist in yourself?

When we resist ourselves we create false scarcity: I’m not enough. I’m not as good as… [pick a name]. It’s too hard. There’s no time. I can’t start because I don’t know how it will end. When we focus on what we are not, what we do not have, and what we do not (and often cannot) know, we focus on a self-induced scarcity.

Each of us is naturally abundant. To exist is abundant. Look inside and see the glory of who you are—more than good enough. Instead, we look outside ourselves for the externally generated justification and gratification we think we need in order to matter, to be important, but that we can never fully get from someone else.

We cannot (must not) wait for other people to tell us that we’re worthwhile.

I exist. You exist. We are. We are already important. We don’t need someone else to tell us so. We have something to offer the world. We are the person we’ve been waiting for.